Compass
Search
Today's Date: 24 May 2013
Last Updated: 24 May 2013 18:48:10 CIT
CayCompass Community
Find us on Facebook

Editorial for 20 August: Rebuilding our reputation

Although it is evident that increased revenue is necessary, at least in the short term, in order for government to produce an acceptable budget plan this year, it is equally evident - at least to rational spectators - that government also needs to cut expenditures to prevent future budget crises. The current dire situation, which has its roots in imprudent and wasteful spending and a burgeoning public service, cannot be swept away by new taxes. Rather, the entire culture of government is long overdue for a metamorphosis into that of a responsible steward of the public purse.

The government can no longer afford to operate as if the Cayman Islands were some backwater provinciality tucked away from international interest. Over the past 40 years, Cayman has established itself as a first-class tourist destination and global financial centre. The current budget crisis has damaged Cayman’s reputation and government now needs to begin functioning in a fiscally responsible manner.

Procurement is just one of the functions that needs modernising. Numerous incidents have demonstrated that government’s procurement processes, when they exist at all, are inadequate to prevent waste and at times show apparent conflicts of interest or good old-fashioned nepotism.

Take, for just one example, the Department of Tourism’s spending of nearly $19,000 to fly a local band to perform in Panama for travel agents, and an as-yet-unknown amount for the same band to play in New York City.

It is not relevant whether the band plays good music or even if it were fiscally prudent to send these musicians abroad, considering the current state of government finances. What is worrying is the Department’s inability to substantiate how or why it selects local performers. The fact that the band of 12 included three public servants - one very high ranking - only exacerbated the issue, casting a shadow of impropriety, even if there was none. Sadly, this kind of situation is all too common with government contracts.

Following established and transparent processes in the spending of public money, in amounts great and relatively small, is essential if Cayman is to regain its reputation of fiscal responsibility.

 

 
Share your Comment
We welcome your comments on our stories. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited.
IMPORTANT IDENTITY INFORMATION: You will be able to create a ‘nickname’ which will allow you to remain anonymous, however, whilst we collect login information from you, this information will be kept confidential and only used to contact you directly, if required. We require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. Read our ethics policy
Please login to comment on our stories.    Log In | Register
 
JimmyCrackCorn
Editorial for 20 August: Rebuilding our reputation
Posted by JimmyCrackCorn on 8/20/2012 11:43:21 AM

I think this editorial misses the point when talking about the local band. How or why it selects the band is irrelevant. I know that a number of musicians on the island are upset about this because there was no application process, but who cares? I'd rather the Department of Tourism just choose the band they want rather than waste time and money on an audition process.

The bigger problem to me is the cost -- 19,000 for 12 people is crazy. That breaks down to almost 1,600 per person. They should have worked with Cayman Airways to procure free airfare, and worked out an accomodations deal with a local hotel. This is an excessive amount of money to spend when services could have been provided for free.

The choice of the band is irrelevant -- it's the expenditures thereafter that matter.
Agree agree ( 4 )
Disagree disagree ( 1 )
JTB
Editorial for 20 August: Rebuilding our reputation
Posted by JTB on 8/20/2012 7:40:11 AM

It would also help if the Government could learn to see the auditor general as part of the solution and welcome his reports, rather than demonise him as a part of the problem
Agree agree ( 31 )
Disagree disagree ( 0 )
 
Copyright © 2013 Cayman Free Press Ltd. All Rights Reserved.