With the current economic environment still heavily focused on regulation, PKF (Cayman) Ltd and PKF-CAP LLP in Singapore have prepared this summary comparison of the fund regulations in two of the major global jurisdictions. Funds are defined in the Cayman Islands regulations as mutual funds (funds) and the Singapore regulations as collective investment schemes (CIS).
Cayman Islands |
Singapore |
|
|
Regulatory body |
Cayman Islands Monetary Authority (“CIMA”) |
Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”)
|
| Regulation |
Mutual Funds Law (2009) Revision, The Mutual Funds (Amendment) Law, 2011 ( together, the “Law”) |
Securities and Futures Act (Cap. 289) Part XIII Offers of Investments –
Division 2 Collective Investment Schemes (“SFA”) – Statutory.
The Code on Collective Investment Schemes (the “Code”) – Non Statutory, but its guidance is highly recommended.
|
Set up requirements |
Mutual Fund Licence (“MFL”) required (ie filing of the offering document
and appointment and due diligence of service providers).
|
No person shall make an offer of units in a CIS if it has not been
authorised under section 286 or recognised under section 287 of the SFA
(ie completion of appropriate due diligence. |
Types of funds |
Registered Mutual Fund Administered Mutual Fund – must have aCIMA-licensed mutual fund administrator providing its principal office. Licensed Mutual Fund – all funds except; administered mutual funds,
funds that meet the criteria set out in section 4(3) of the Law or
exempt funds. |
Authorised Schemes (constituted in Singapore) Also a
Singapore representative is required.
Recognised Schemes (constituted outside Singapore), the laws and
practices of the jurisdictions under which the CIS is constituted and
regulated affords to investors in Singapore protection at least
equivalent to that provided to them by or under the SFA.
|
| Exemptions |
The equity interests are held by not more than15 investors; or It is a fund, not incorporated or establishedin the Cayman
Islands, which makes an invitation to the public to subscribe for its
equity interests by or through a person who is the holder of a licence
under the Securities Investment Business Law and those interests are
listed on a stock exchange or the fund is regulated by an overseas
regulatory authority. |
The issue or transfer of equity interest for no consideration
Small offers ($5m or less over a 12 month period) Private placement (no more than 50 persons within a 12 month period)
Offers to institutional investors
Offers to accredited investors/ other relevant persons
|
Name of the fund |
Certain restrictions on what may constitute the name of a fund, eg CIMA
may refuse to grant a MFL if a name is identical to that of another
company, if it suggests a false connection to another person or
authority or falsely suggests the fund has a special status with the
Government. |
The name of the scheme should;
(i) be appropriate,
(ii) not be undesirable and
(iii) not be misleading ( all per the Code).
|
Prospectus requirements |
Offering document (current and updated) to be filed with CIMA |
Prospectus or profile statement to be lodged and registered by MAS. The prospectus needs to be registered every 12 months. |
Other licences required |
Mutual Fund Administrators Licence required. |
The CIS manager must hold a capital markets services licence for fund
management and trustees must be approved (Authorised Schemes). |
Audit |
Annual audit required by a Cayman Islands auditor, approved by CIMA. The
fund annual return and audited accounts to be filed with CIMA within
six months of year end.
The accounting standards to be used are those documented in the offering
document and consent letter. The majority of funds utilise US GAAP and
IFRS.
|
Participants in an Authorised Scheme should receive: (i) the
semi-annual accounts and semi-annual report within two months from the
period end and (ii) the audited annual accounts, and annual report
within three months from the financial year end. Specific requirements
to be i ncluded in the reports are described below.
Authorised schemes use Singapore FRS (substantially equivalent to IFRS)
with further guidance prescribed in “Recommended Accounting Practice 7:
Reporting Framework for Unit Trusts”.
|
Inspection |
Whenever CIMA considers it necessary, it can examine, by way of scrutiny
of prescribed regular returns, on-site inspections or auditors’ reports
or in such other manner as CIMA may determine, the affairs or business
of any regulated mutual fund or licensee for the purpose of a general
review or for the purpose of satisfying itself that the Law and any
regulations made under the Law or under the Proceeds of Crime Law, 2008
are being complied with. |
MAS may from time to time inspect the books of an approved trustee. The
trustee under inspection must give access to and produce its books and
give such information and facilities as may be required to conduct the
inspection or as MAS may otherwise require. |
| Fines |
Various fines for breaches of the Law present. |
Various fines and the possibility of imprisonment for breaches of the SFA present. |
In addition we would like to draw the reader’s attention to some of the other requirements of the Code. The Code sets out best practices on management, operation and marketing of schemes that managers and approved trustees are expected to observe:
For Authorised Schemes – there are requirements on the name of the scheme, filing of reports, the function and responsibilities of investment managers, the structure of performance fees, requirements of the trustee on termination of the scheme, restrictions on trading activities, limitation on participants liability to their investment in the scheme and guidelines on dealing and valuation of the scheme’s units and valuation of the scheme’s assets.
For Recognised Schemes – in addition to the legal requirements set out in the SFA, a manager of a scheme (together with its related corporations) should be managing at least S$500 million of discretionary funds in Singapore. This requirement does not apply where any of the units in the scheme has been approved for listing for quotation on a securities exchange and will be traded on the securities exchange.
For Recognised and Authorised Schemes – which feed into an underlying scheme and there is the intention to use or invest in financial derivatives or their NAV is likely to have a high volatility due to its investment policies or portfolio management techniques, there needs to be a prominent statement in the scheme’s marketing material drawing attention to this.
The appendices to the Code – also contain additional requirements depending on the strategy of the CIS, (ie, money market funds, hedge funds (quarterly reports, semi-annual accounts and reports and annual audited accounts and reports, with certain exceptions to the items listed below), capital guarantee funds, index funds and property funds).
The following are the requirements which the semi-annual and annual reports should contain;
| a) |
investments at market value and as a percentage of the scheme’s NAV as at the end of the period under review classified by: |
| |
i) country; ii) industry; iii) asset class; and iv) credit rating; |
| b) |
the top 10 holdings at market value and as a percentage of the scheme’s
NAV as at the end of the period under review and a year ago; |
| c) |
exposure to financial derivatives: |
| i) |
market value of financial derivative contracts and as a percentage of
the scheme’s NAV as at the end of the period under review; |
| ii) |
net gains
or losses on financial derivative contracts realised during the period
under review; and |
| iii) |
net gains or losses on outstanding financial derivative contracts
marked to market as at the end of the period under review; |
| d) |
amount and percentage of the scheme’s NAV invested in other schemes as at the end of the period under review; |
| e) |
amount and percentage of borrowings to the scheme’s NAV at the end of the period under review; |
| f) |
amount of redemptions and subscriptions for the period under review; |
| g) |
amount of related-party transactions for the period under review; |
| h) |
the performance of the scheme and where applicable, the performance of
the benchmark, in a consistent format, covering the following periods of
time: 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year and since
inception of the scheme; |
| i) |
expense ratios for the period under review and a year ago. A footnote
should state that the expense ratio does not include (where applicable)
brokerage and other transaction costs, performance fee, foreign exchange
gains or losses, front or back end loads arising from the purchase or
sale of other schemes and tax deducted at source or arising out of
income received; |
| j) |
turnover ratios for the period under review and a year ago; |
| k) |
any material information that will adversely impact the valuation of
the scheme such as contingent liabilities of open contracts; |
| 1) |
where the manager invests 30 per cent or more of the scheme’s NAV
in another scheme, the following key information on the underlying
scheme should be disclosed: |
| i) |
top 10 holdings at market value and as a percentage of the scheme’s NAV
as at the end of the period under review and a year ago; |
| ii) |
expense ratios for the period under review and a year ago (see guidance above); and |
| iii) |
turnover ratios for the period under review and a year ago; |
| m) |
a statement describing the soft dollars received from each broker which
executed transactions for the scheme. If the broker also executed trades
for other schemes managed by the manager, a statement to that effect
may be included; and |
| n) |
where the scheme offers pre-determined payouts, an explanation on the
calculation of the actual payouts received by participants and any
significant deviation from the pre-determined payouts. |
There has been significant growth in the asset management industry in Singapore which has lead to opportunities for collaboration for example with global PKF offices and this trend is expected to continue.
As can be seen the regulations for the two jurisdictions are similar, however, with different areas of focus (ie requirements being enacted into law as opposed to a non-statutory code). Also regulations are more focused on mutual fund administrators in Cayman as opposed to managers and trustees in Singapore. Both jurisdictions have responded to the global demands for more regulatory oversight with the Code being updated in October 2011 and The Mutual Funds (Amendment) Law, 2011 being passed in December 2011.
It is our view that both the Cayman Islands and Singapore will continue to monitor the evolving demands of the industry and adapt their regulatory frameworks to meet or exceed those demands.